When it comes to pensions, it is of paramount importance to Re-DOC on time!

Posted on 2nd December 2024 by Streets Employment Law


Image to represent When it comes to pensions, it is of paramount importance to Re-DOC on time!

A tribunal recently ruled on the failure of a private limited company, El Recruitment Ltd., to submit its Re-DOC before the statutory deadline as required under the 'Employer Duties' of the Pensions Act 2008. The Pensions Regulator had sent two prior letters, although the company failed to do so and received a compliance notice addressed to the registered office address which was considered properly served.

The regulator unsuccessfully attempted to call the appellant using the number held within its records. El Recruitment did not complete the Re-DOC by the extended deadline and so the Pensions Regulator issued a £400 fixed penalty per Section 144A of the Act.

The director argued that they had moved out of the registered office and forgot to update the registered office address, although they could not be reached by telephone. However, the Tribunal was unmoved and unconvinced by this argument, as one of the reminders had been sent before the move and was still ignored.

While the Pensions Regulator is not obliged to send reminder communications it usually does so as a courtesy and the Company’s appeal over its £400 fine was unsuccessful. This case highlights the importance of filing promptly and allowing sufficient time for delivery.  Re-enrolment must take place every three years at a date of your choosing. To do so today visit https://declaration.ae.tpr.gov.uk/


No Advice

The content produced and presented by Streets is for general guidance and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Furthermore, it should not be considered a recommendation or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities or other form of financial asset. The information provided by Streets is of a general nature and is not specific for any individual or entity. Appropriate and tailored advice or independent research should be obtained before making any such decisions. Streets does not accept any liability for any loss or damage which is incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of obtaining Streets' visual or audible content.

Information

The content used by Streets has been obtained from or is based on sources that we believe to be accurate and reliable. Although reasonable care has been taken in gathering the necessary information, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information we publish and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions in material. You should always seek specific advice prior to making any investment, legal or tax decisions.


Expert insight and news straight
to your inbox

Related Articles


Self-employment cannot be used as a tax smokescreen for contracted employees

A complex celebrity case arose recently in which the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) was asked to consider the application of the intermediaries’ legislation (IR35), otherwise known as off-payroll working, to payments made by Manchester United Football


Not all hurt feelings are uncapped & costly

The Employment Appeal Tribunal slashed a £10,000 award for injury to feeling by 80% after an original tribunal ruling was deemed not to be Meek compliant as it failed to provide adequate reasons for the quantum awarded. A Miss Graham was employed by


It is not always possible to mend fences – Reinstatement is not always a practicable option where there is a breakdown in employment relations

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld claims of constructive dismissal and disability discrimination against Whyte & Mackay Limited (W&ML) in the case of Mr. Duployen , a former forklift truck and warehouse operator, following his

You might also be interested in...